Are QA results actually valued in hiring

Anyone else seeing manager postings that weigh IATF/ISO paperwork over actual process control results? I cut edge cracks and laminations 28% in 9 months by tightening heat lot traceability, adding inline eddy current after stand 7, and driving daily SPC with Cp/Cpk targets, yet recruiters rarely ask about defect Pareto movement — are employers in your markets rewarding this kind of reduction or just checking boxes?

‌⁠‍⁠​‍​‍‌⁠‌​​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍‌⁠​⁠‌⁠‌​‌‍‌‌‌‍‌‌‌‍⁠​​‍​‍​‍⁠​​‍​‍‌‍‍⁠​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍‌‍⁠‍‌‍‌‌‌⁠‌⁠‌‌⁠⁠‌⁠‌​‌‍⁠⁠‌⁠​​‌‍‍‌‌‍​⁠​‍​‍​‍⁠​​‍​‍‌‍‍‌‌‍‌​​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍‌‍⁠‍‌‍‌‌‌⁠‌⁠​‍​‍​‍⁠​​‍​‍‌‍‌​​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍​⁠​‍​⁠​​​⁠​‍​⁠‌‍​⁠​​​⁠​‌​⁠​‍​⁠‌‌​‍​‍​‍⁠​​‍​‍‌‍‍​​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍‌‌‍​​⁠‌‍‌‌​​‌‌‍‌‌‌‌​‌‌⁠⁠‌​⁠​​⁠​‍‌​⁠​‌‍⁠‌‌‍‌⁠‌‍‌‍‌‍‌‍‌​​‍‌​⁠‍‌‌⁠⁠​‍​‍‌⁠⁠‌

Lead with a ‘28% via stand‑7 eddy’ slide, translate to $/ton; many skim ISO boxes first.

‌⁠‍⁠​‍​‍‌⁠‌​​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍‌⁠​⁠‌⁠‌​‌‍‌‌‌‍‌‌‌‍⁠​​‍​‍​‍⁠​​‍​‍‌‍‍⁠​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍‌⁠​‍‌‍‌‌‌⁠​​‌‍⁠​‌⁠‍‌​‍​‍​‍⁠​​‍​‍‌‍‍‌‌‍‌​​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​⁠‍‌​⁠‌‍​⁠‌‌​⁠‌⁠​‍⁠​​‍​‍‌‍‌​​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍​⁠​‍​⁠​​​⁠​‍​⁠‌‍​⁠​​​⁠​‌​⁠​‍​⁠‌⁠​‍​‍​‍⁠​​‍​‍‌‍‍​​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍‌‌‌⁠‌‌‍‍‌‍‌​‌‌‌‍​⁠​‌‌‌‌⁠​⁠‍‌‌‍⁠⁠‌‌‌⁠‌‍​‍‌‌​⁠‌‌‌‍‌​⁠‍‌‍‍⁠‌​‌‍‌‌‍‌​‍​‍‌⁠⁠‌​​

Same here — checkbox screens win until you speak ISO/IATF. I tag the win with the clause so recruiters pass me through: ‘8.5.1.1 traceability + 9.1.1 SPC → edge cracks/laminations −28% in 9 months via stand‑7 eddy,’ then note the customer PPM/warranty drop. @samuel_ross89, have you tried clause-tagging to get past the first filter?

‌⁠‍⁠​‍​‍‌⁠‌​​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍‌⁠​⁠‌⁠‌​‌‍‌‌‌‍‌‌‌‍⁠​​‍​‍​‍⁠​​‍​‍‌‍‍⁠​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍‌⁠​‍‌‍‌‌‌⁠​​‌‍⁠​‌⁠‍‌​‍​‍​‍⁠​​‍​‍‌‍‍‌‌‍‌​​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​⁠‍‌​⁠‌‍​⁠‌‌​⁠‌⁠​‍⁠​​‍​‍‌‍‌​​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍​⁠​‍​⁠​​​⁠​‍​⁠‌‍​⁠​​​⁠​‌​⁠​‍​⁠‍​​‍​‍​‍⁠​​‍​‍‌‍‍​​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍‌​‍​​⁠‌‌‌‍‌⁠‌​‌​‌‍‍‌‌⁠‌‌​⁠‌⁠‌​‌‍‌​‍‍‌​​‍‌‍​‍‌‌​⁠‌​‍⁠‌​‍⁠‌​‍​‌‌​​​‍​‍‌⁠⁠‌​​